AGE VS. COMPETENCE: WHAT SHOULD TRULY MATTER IN LEADERSHIP SELECTION?
The debate over whether age should influence the election or appointment of individuals into leadership positions, particularly political offices, has been ongoing worldwide. Advocates for prioritizing competence over age argue that the ability to lead effectively should be the key criterion, not the number of years a person has lived. They often cite examples like the current U.S. President, Joe Biden, who at 79 years old is regarded by many as performing well in office. Supporters of this view maintain that as long as a candidate is in good physical and mental health, age should not be a barrier to leadership. They emphasize that leadership primarily involves executive functions—setting goals and overseeing their achievement—rather than physically performing every task. According to them, a leader’s role is to monitor and guide rather than be physically present for every action. On the other hand, opponents argue that older individuals, especially those above 65, should be discourage...